View Single Post
Old 08-24-2020, 08:02 PM   #45
P-3 Guy
Senior Member
 
P-3 Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Under the former KNHZ bounce pattern
Posts: 476
Thanks: 3
Thanked 207 Times in 110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tis View Post
And I guess my whole thought was, we are so fussy about what goes into the lake, that I am surprised we allow the risk of an accident by allowing the refueling of planes over it. Even though it may be a very low risk I imagine it could happen. Is there a reason the military needs to do it over water rather than on land?
The air refueling tracks are not made up on the fly (pun intended); they are established in coordination with the FAA and are pretty expansive. (See the track in post #23 as depicted by flight aware.) Given the size of the AR tracks, there is no practical way to keep the entire evolution over dry land. As previously mentioned, your concern about jet fuel finding its way into the lake because of some kind of air refueling incident is seriously misplaced.
P-3 Guy is offline   Reply With Quote