Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeDad
BTW, The logical fallacy you used in this response is called the “false dilemma”.
You made it look like it has to be one or the other.
“Which is it”?
I never said that and it doesn’t.
The nuances here are simple and I’ve already explained them. A person, not an extended family, is on the list.
I am more than open to a civil debate but I’m going to call out a logical fallacy or weak tactic every time.
I actually take offense to it because you’re attempting to trick me or “win” by arguing a position I never held.
How about instead focusing on finding truth?
Please form better debates.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
Enough with the rhetorical jargon—it's condescending and lame, especially when we're having a discussion to clarify your points that, as others have done already on your reservations post, are often inconsistent.
Now, to the topic of this thread: you agree that passing down slip "ownership" through generations is not ok. Why then isn't it ok for members of an association to want to change that? Why would being "noobs" matter if the policy isn't fair/right/reasonable and if there's enough of the association who agrees?
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk