Thread: Ropeswings
View Single Post
Old 01-31-2016, 10:47 AM   #43
P-3 Guy
Senior Member
 
P-3 Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Under the former KNHZ bounce pattern
Posts: 476
Thanks: 3
Thanked 207 Times in 110 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu View Post
I agree with TMI Guy that the article does not say the father/kid/lawyer admitted to knowing it was dangerous, BUT in order for the accident to happen, the pair had to be swimming in an area that, as a teen and father, they knew to be potentially dangerous.
I would say that any place you can swim is "potentially dangerous." It's a good bet that the lawsuit argues this particular location is made more dangerous than it otherwise would have been because of conditions that the town (but not the kid/father) was aware of but did nothing to remediate.
P-3 Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to P-3 Guy For This Useful Post: