Quote:
Originally Posted by GenericG
Sawyerpoint...thank you very much for your service to this community. I think, at face value, lrct mission is in good intent. However, their proposed NRZ on east side of ragged does not support max public use of their preserved properties. Furthermore lrct's proposed nrz is attempting to limit public use of lake Winnipesaukee, property which lrct has no (or rather SHOULD have no) governance/management/authority etc. Lake Winnipesaukee itself is not owned or safeguarded by lrct
|
If you were having problems with trespass from an abutting property... you wouldn't ask the neighbors to restrict the problem?
LRCT didn't seek to govern... they sought the ''management'' team of the lake to govern.
That team/process is their choice... but they will need to weigh it with the additional costs of policing that their ''guests'' do not infringe on the property rights managed by LRCT.
It is a pretty straight forward process much as it would be with any other two abutting ''neighbors''.