View Single Post
Old 04-07-2008, 02:57 PM   #82
brk-lnt
Senior Member
 
brk-lnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Down Shores
Posts: 1,938
Thanks: 533
Thanked 568 Times in 334 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resident 2B View Post
Let the money go to something that helps something that needs help.
I think that is a slippery slope as well though. Then you set precedent for implementing fines and dictating (or endlessly arguing over) where/how the fund should be distributed.

I don't know the emotions of the planning board, but I am guessing this is more about enforcement of approved plans, than punishment for not following the approved plans. If the cost to re-do had been $4500, or $450,000, the decision should have been the same.
brk-lnt is offline   Reply With Quote