Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Islander
It was LAST YEAR!
You may have a different definition of "high-speed", but any speed that is a lot more than conditions allow meets mine.
This Letter to the Editor is a perfect example of the arguments the opposition must overcome. And quite frankly, that is all but impossible.
|
Bear Islander....
If your definition of hi-speed is based on prevailing conditions, then you would have to agree that there are times and places on the Lake where the prevailing conditions would allow for Hi-Performance boats to run free of restriction....
For example the Broads on a day like today.... Bluebird weather, unlimited visibility and nary a boat out there!
There is very little doubt (IMHO) that the boat was travelling too fast for the prevailing conditions that fateful night. This accident appears (to me) to meet the burden of proof for Coast Guard Rule 6 (that NH NEEDS to adopt) and NH Negligent Operation/Failure to Keep a Proper Lookout. The effect that HB-847 would have, should have, could have had on that fateful night is still very unclear.
The NHMP has yet to make the accident report public, so we dont know the estimated speed of the boat at impact. We do not know her BAC. Its entirely possible she was traveling at 25MPH or less when the boat struck the island. If thats the case then HB-847 would have had no effect on the tragic outcome...
But she could quite possibly be in violation of other PRE-EXISTING LAWS!
Woodsy