View Single Post
Old 11-24-2013, 11:01 AM   #45
BroadHopper
Senior Member
 
BroadHopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Laconia NH
Posts: 5,512
Thanks: 3,118
Thanked 1,090 Times in 784 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakegeezer View Post
It disturbs me that we usually hear of the new rafting and now anchoring restrictions after the decision has been made. There seems to be no watchdog group, protecting the boating public. While the public hearing was probably posted, it sure wasn't mentioned here, where those effected would hear about it. Why can't the state require effective public notice, just to give these restrictions a fair hearing?
Actually, SBONH have been publicizing this action since September. You will see a number of bills pertaining to boating coming up on the website. Take a look, it is open to the public.

If there is enough objections to a particular bill or hearing, SBONH will actively look into it. Until now, SBONH notice the 'chatter' on this thread.

I agree that we should let DOS know that basing NRZ on environmental issues and throw in 'big rafting parties exists' when there is no proof. We all can prove that the area is not good for rafting because of topography and we need DOS to hear this. I have sent my letter and I am sure the other members of SBONH did the same. If we give the property owners an inch they will go the mile.

Please visit SBONH.org and please feel free to leave comments so that SBONH will know how you feel.

We may be quiet, but we are still engaged, ready to embraced our rights, and drive it home.
__________________
Someday may never be an actual day.
BroadHopper is offline