View Single Post
Old 07-21-2022, 11:41 AM   #59
FlyingScot
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Tuftonboro and Sudbury, MA
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 1,112
Thanked 934 Times in 576 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Mercier View Post
Sorry, I am an extremist on this issue.

I think we should privatize as much of the operation on that mountain that we can.

I don't think any private group has ever offered to take over the alpine ski operation, or any of the trails.

But retail, food, and accommodations should be as private as possible... supported by private investment, and paying a healthy rental fee to the mountain for the opportunity.

I just don't think the delegation is really on board with that...
Ha! You are correct--I think of you as a rational Republican with whom I have much in common...

I agree there's a fair debate about public vs private, and that there may be certain deal structures that are better for both the town and the skiers. But don't you think Sylvia and Co are operating in bad faith? (the software, the legal fees, their treatment of highly qualified board members, the utter disregard for a competent management team) Do they really seem like the guys who are going to do what's best in general?

We need skilled professionals figuring this out, not ideologues

Last edited by FlyingScot; 07-21-2022 at 12:43 PM.
FlyingScot is offline   Reply With Quote