Quote:
Originally Posted by OCDACTIVE
VERY Well said Maxum, I think a simple Thank You at the bottom was not sufficient in this case.
Even though we are on different sides of the debate I appreciate your views that a study needs to be conducted. I for one want to see what the MP says about the trial period. If 2 years wasn't long enough then perhaps extend it a year to finally prove one way or another whether the speed limits are needed.
I would be willing to continue on with the study until the data is made public, then go by what the MP recommends.
|
Welcome! We may not agree in principal as to what we personally feel about this, but unlike most at least the two of us agree on the most important thing. Look at the evidence and base a decision on that alone. Provided that's how things go down, I'm cool with accepting the outcome even if it doesn't include a speed limit. See OCDACTIVE if everyone were like the two of us this world would be a wonderful place
