View Single Post
Old 04-15-2020, 02:47 PM   #18
TheTimeTraveler
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 818
Thanks: 258
Thanked 259 Times in 157 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodsy View Post
There is a pretty simple compromise here.... that benefits the city and the Dive.

The City should lease (5 year/option to renew) the outermost finger to the Dive (closest to the beach). This is currently the pick up/drop off area. Move the pick up/drop off to the other side of the same finger... This buys the City some time to decide IF they want to reconfigure the docks, and HOW they may want to do so.... without being constrained by any "new" construction to the docks. We all know how slowly the wheels of progress turn in the Weirs!

The Dive (as proposed) can pay for the improvements necessary for them to operate (electrical/sewage) and also pay to relocate those services should the docks be reconfigured.

If the City decides to reconfigure the dock, the Dive can then pay for one of those fingers in return for a long term lease (as proposed)

In this scenario... everybody wins.

Woodsy
Sounds like a reasonable, easy solution, but trust me, it won't be a simple fix.
TheTimeTraveler is offline   Reply With Quote