View Single Post
Old 07-06-2018, 05:46 PM   #4
Seaplane Pilot
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,111
Thanks: 564
Thanked 855 Times in 330 Posts

Originally Posted by Turtle Boy View Post
Lots of pro speed limit people on the lake had "skin in the game", myself included. Contrary to what some of the SL opponents have parroted, safety was only one of many reasons for WinnFABS to push for a SL. And from where we live the difference after the speed limit was like night and day. Considerably fewer boats, many trailered here, screaming past you at 70+MPH only 150' away. It was unpleasant and the reputation of the lake suffered (a Boston newspaper had a scathing review of what the lake had become). Just like no one wants to picnic on the median strip of I-93, so too people felt that the lake was far less enjoyable because of a minority of boats that had a disproportionate presence on the lake. Furthermore, by large margin, polls showed that the people of NH as well as people locally favored speed limits as did the majority of our local state legislators in the Lake's Region. Sign ins at the State House hearings were similarly pro SL by a large margin. And contrary to what the go fast be loud crowd theorized, the economy of the Lake's Region did not go down the toilet.
Having been on the lake all my life it is a pleasure to see how people got together to make the lake a more pleasurable destination. These same people would/will go to all lengths to defend the speed limit which in my opinion saved the lake. And no, having been here all my life I'm not moving to "Golden Pond" so save your breath. For the last 8 years families have reclaimed the lake and I'm pleased with the outcome.
(that’s the yawn symbol in case anyone is wondering) And by the way, who gives a rat’s ass what any Boston newspaper has to say about the lake. Why don’t they write about Boston Harbor madness on a summer weekend?
Seaplane Pilot is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Seaplane Pilot For This Useful Post: