Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfeboro_Baja
Regarding ALL the discussion that's been had in this thread and the two letters to the editor posted here, how can the BP NWZ not be wide enough for two boats to pass each other while maintaining the minimum 150' between both crafts and shore? Using Google Earth, I measured the width of that area; the minimum width I found, shore to shore, was 825 ft while other areas were greater than 900 ft. Two boats passing each other would need an absolute minimum of 450' to allow for distances between themselves and shore on either side. Even if you allow 500', that STILL leaves 300'+ to maintain distance from other boats and shore. What am I missing when so many people are saying it's too narrow?!?!?
|
Nobody from
SBONH-NHRBA will advise this BP visitor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtagrip
Why is it that all are in agreement with what SBONH exposed this scam except 3 or 4 people in this forum. They tried to sneak a NWZ through the process and got called on it. I guess it's only the sneaks in this forum that are upset about it.  |
1) As I am scarcely benefited by the NWZ—and had nothing to do with it in
any of its
four proposals—please leave out the insinuation that ApS is part of this proposal.
2) However, having lingered at the BP in a small boat, I can now readily support BP residents regarding this "Visitor-Abuse" issue.
3) BTW: Who will go "on record", saying:
Quote:
"There will NEVER be a NWZ at Barber Pole!" 
|