Quote:
Originally Posted by brk-lnt
My comment was not in regards to whether or not this discussion topic was allowed, but more to the point that every single one of these threads in the past have simply degraded to futility.
There is not enough data to draw a logical conclusion from, and furthermore you are forever trying to argue to disprove a negative. You say there were many accidents this year, and it's easy for someone to say "yeah, and without the speed limit we SURELY would have had more". There is NO way you can counter that kind of statement.
I'd love to see a discussion about something based in facts and reality, not just another rehashed opinion thread.
|
Then rephrase it. Yes, there were far more accidents this year than last, and I believe the year before that as well.
Here's a great question, which requires nothing more than facts, that are readily available.
Have any of the accidents this year, or last, involved speeds that would indicate to you that a speed limit was needed on the lake?
The data is available, and you can get it for a decade or more.
Another question. Have any of the accidents this year indicated that a speed limit was needed on the lake? How about last year, or the year before. The facts are available, so I guess no speculation is really required.
No rehash required. Step right up to the plate and hit the pitch.