View Single Post
Old 02-24-2023, 07:27 AM   #5
WinnisquamZ
Senior Member
 
WinnisquamZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,892
Thanks: 192
Thanked 594 Times in 399 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakegeezer View Post
While I understand the sentiment against short term rentals and the desire for more regulation, it's important to acknowledge that there is another side of the coin.

As a real-life example, consider an elderly couple who bought their lake house in the 1950s but aren't necessarily wealthy. Now, the widow requires constant nursing care which can be incredibly expensive. The income generated from a short term rental is actually paying for her care and helping to keep the house in the family. This may be their only option to keep the property and retire there in the future.

It's important to consider the individual circumstances and potential benefits before dismissing short term rentals altogether.
All true. But, when the property owner refuses to address short term rental issues like parking, noise and garbage. A city or town must actively get involved to protect others. We have three short term rentals in our neighborhood. Not permitted by the city. However, the owners are responsive when issues arise
WinnisquamZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links