Winnipesaukee Forum - View Single Post

John Mercier · 10-17-2021, 02:20 PM

My point is that since it is not town, Part 1 Article 28-a plays a role.
A lawsuit, depending on outcome, could alter or even scrap the program.

Since the property is intended as an investment, that plays an overreaching role in the decision on what to invest in, and what the timeline of the hold is.

And there is no ''grandfathering''. The biggest possibility of a lawsuit on that issue would be could the municipality do a 10% penalty against a property due to the fact that the property no long had the CU option.

10-17-2021, 02:20 PM	#59
John Mercier Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2021 Posts: 2,973 Thanks: 2 Thanked 528 Times in 434 Posts	My point is that since it is not town, Part 1 Article 28-a plays a role. A lawsuit, depending on outcome, could alter or even scrap the program. Since the property is intended as an investment, that plays an overreaching role in the decision on what to invest in, and what the timeline of the hold is. And there is no ''grandfathering''. The biggest possibility of a lawsuit on that issue would be could the municipality do a 10% penalty against a property due to the fact that the property no long had the CU option. Last edited by John Mercier; 10-17-2021 at 02:23 PM. Reason: Add comment