Quote:
Originally Posted by AC2717
yes correct, tax based on values on a market assessed value. What I am saying is that market assessed value should not be apart of it
|
So if market value should not be any part of it, what differentiating factors should be considered? What are your taxes paying for? Roads, schools, bridges, police fire?
Why shouldn't your taxes be based on what government services you could potentially use and need to have available?
No kids in the school system? Lower the tax. Part time resident? Lower that tax. Only one or two people living in your property? Lower the tax.
Why is the family with 5 kids paying less property and federal tax then you? Aren't you, the single homeowner, using a lot less in government services than that large family?
Is the tax structure completely backward?
In an ideal situation shouldn't taxes be to support services that you need?