Quote:
Originally Posted by LIforrelaxin
And as long as the town doesn't allow improvements beyond cutting down the posts there never will be.
|
How is cutting down the wharf posts an improvement for anyone but Mr. Wood? For many boat operators who want to tie up at the wharf, lower posts could end up being a detriment.
Since you seem to have taken on the role of Mr. Wood's mouthpiece, perhaps you can answer some questions specifically about the wharf posts and how Mr. Wood proposes to secure his seaplane to the wharf, questions that I have asked multiple times here and that Mr. Wood has ignored even as he declared the thread "definitely dead":
“For tail clearance. It's not just for me. That's what I'm trying to convey.”
If it's not just for you, who else wants to have the wharf posts shortened?
How far will the tail project over the wharf when the aircraft is alongside?
When the aircraft is secured to the wharf, what will the aircraft's orientation be?
It sounds like the aft ends of the floats will be facing the wharf, is this correct?
"As low as possible down to deck height... leaving enough for boaters to tie to." What is the maximum post height that would be acceptable to you?
Do you want to shorten all posts, or only certain posts?