Quote:
Originally Posted by The Real BigGuy
I believe Maxim is correct..... it appears that the SCNH case is to clear up the jurisdictional dispute between DES and Wetlands.
If DES wins the “boathouse” will have to be “adjusted” to meet their requirements. If Wetlands wins, either the Corrs get to complete it or other litigation follows.
Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app
|
My first thought on this was that the dispute was between DES and Wetlands. This thread took on a whole nother force once people started digging deeper.
As with (most?) everyone else, the initial thought/opinion was based on the LDS article which only shared one side of the story. Not exactly "fake news" by the paper but, definitely a derivative of such.