Winnipesaukee Forum - View Single Post - Homeowner: Keep 150 ft away from my dock!

Rich · 08-03-2015, 01:08 PM

I agree with you! Everyone should be courteous!

Trying to decipher this area from the written law is confusing. Sort of 'it depends on the definition of what "is" is'! LOL

Here are all the tax maps:
http://www.tuftonboro.org/Pages/Tuft...ap%20Index.PDF

Here is map 63:
http://www.tuftonboro.org/pages/Tuft...s/map%2063.PDF
Here is map 51:
http://www.tuftonboro.org/pages/Tuft...s/map%2051.PDF

The text of the law says "Southern Boundary of tax map" when referring to both lots that are supposed to mark the NRZ. So I'm not sure if it is describing the location on the map (southern boundary) as to where to find the lot in question (which seems most likely), or to describe the southern boundary of the lot as the point where the NRZ starts and ends.

I would say that the state law has a typo as Bizer mentioned tax map 15 doesn't even touch the lake, and lot 20 on it is no where near the area in question (not to mention there are more than one lot 20 on that map also).

Does anyone care to show how they can interpret this rule in any way other than what Bizer has documented?

08-03-2015, 01:08 PM	#39
Rich Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Derry / Gilford Posts: 1,222 Thanks: 69 Thanked 341 Times in 231 Posts	I agree with you! Everyone should be courteous! Trying to decipher this area from the written law is confusing. Sort of 'it depends on the definition of what "is" is'! LOL Here are all the tax maps: http://www.tuftonboro.org/Pages/Tuft...ap%20Index.PDF Here is map 63: http://www.tuftonboro.org/pages/Tuft...s/map%2063.PDF Here is map 51: http://www.tuftonboro.org/pages/Tuft...s/map%2051.PDF The text of the law says "Southern Boundary of tax map" when referring to both lots that are supposed to mark the NRZ. So I'm not sure if it is describing the location on the map (southern boundary) as to where to find the lot in question (which seems most likely), or to describe the southern boundary of the lot as the point where the NRZ starts and ends. I would say that the state law has a typo as Bizer mentioned tax map 15 doesn't even touch the lake, and lot 20 on it is no where near the area in question (not to mention there are more than one lot 20 on that map also). Does anyone care to show how they can interpret this rule in any way other than what Bizer has documented? __________________ Don't listen to me, obviously I don't understand what I'm talking about! Let's help each other save time and money: WinniGas.com