View Single Post
Old 09-22-2018, 04:35 AM   #93
ApS
Senior Member
 
ApS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida (Sebring & Keys), Wolfeboro
Posts: 5,781
Thanks: 2,080
Thanked 735 Times in 530 Posts
Question "Shadow Government", "Shadow-Banning"—Heard of it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave R View Post
Since there seem to be some avid Trump supporters here, seems like a good place to ask...Trump says he's going to release some classified documents that will prove there was bias against him within the the FBI during the 2016 election and therefore shows the investigation was tainted from the start. To be completely honest, his assertions seem completely plausible, most people hate the guy. So let's say Trump does prove bias, so what? Why would it matter? The investigation has already produced dozens of indictments and a bunch of convictions (most from airtight confessions and plea deals) which means that regardless of the impetus for the investigation, there was clearly a lot of law-breaking going on around the man. I totally get that you can't use illegally gathered evidence to convict someone, but I don't think there are any laws prohibiting law enforcement from investigating (and legally gathering evidence on) someone that they also happen to dislike personally. Anyone here know what the actual laws are on this? To me, it seems like Trump is just posturing in order to change public opinion and that won't have any effect on the current and future convictions that result from the Mueller probe.
"Changing public opinion" has been the macro-focus of the media. They're being called the "Fifth Column" for a reason.

If you have a Smart Phone, you can tune-out from TV ONCE, and tune-in to Hannity on 610 AM-radio at WGIR-Manchester. During just one three hour show, he will educate you with everything we're discussing here—and how media is propagandizing with every broadcast.

It's alarming how the Electorate has become so propagandized! They don't know that, first, the IRS became "weaponized". Now it's the DOJ and FBI!

Who knows how extensive the "Deep State" has become—except that Obama maintains an office in sight of the White House. (And his former advisor, Valerie Jarrett, shares the house with him).

Why do I have to search for the British Daily Mail for a picture of Obama's newly-gated, rental-mansion? Is it because Google is "shadow-banning" such photographs?



Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlazyless View Post
With socialism, everyone starves, except for the bosses in charge of supplying the food. Capitalism works best, just look at the super-duper kayaks you can get for season end mark down prices at the Plymouth Walmart they all sold out all gonzo just one left a $529 now $265, 10' , cap 500-lb, fishing specialized big water kayak, paddle included, duck hunter green! With socialism, the bosses get fat eating sugar donuts and smoking cigars, and everyone else is thin and sick from living on stale bread crusts and sour milk!
DC=District of Corruption...

Why would you ever vote Democrat, seeing they are morphing into Democratic-Socialists? They'll be the ones "in charge of supplying the food"!

ApS is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to ApS For This Useful Post: