Quote:
Originally Posted by thinkxingu
Jetskier,
What do you think is the answer to the fact that most of what you pointed to are issues that SD, etc. should have planned for given that the trail was part of the expectations when those associations were incorporated? (I'm serious, not being snarky)
Sent from my Moto G (5S) Plus using Tapatalk
|
I believe that is a misnomer. From all that I have researched the trail was not a condition of the formal approval for the developments. There are some walking trails (private) that are incorporated and exist.
If someone can point me to any
original documents - plans showing that the actual formal approval of the two associations had the trail as a condition, please provide them.
Jetskier