View Single Post
Old 04-17-2016, 05:36 PM   #34
longislander
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 501
Thanks: 43
Thanked 93 Times in 70 Posts
Wink

Quote:
Just so I am clear, you ...
Hey folks, just got back from the BoBHouse for dinner. Great food and beverage. It's better than a distemper shot!
Who is you? Be clear!

If you're referring to me, and do I:

Quote:
...you believe it is appropriate use of taxpayer dollars to perform renovations/maintenance on a building for which it receives no rent payments and for which the tenant is legally obligated to maintain is appropriate?
Of course, for this case, if you mean adhere to the contract! It is a legally binding document and has negative legal recourse. Don't you follow NH law?

If you're asking me if I think it was a good contract, go back and read my opening statement:

Quote:
"... appears legally odd."
Another reason to have the summer meeting, before the BoS sign another incestuous contract. What would you suggest ... violate NH contract law?
Please ... think about what you're saying!

Regarding debate and ending. No problem, no contest!

Opinion means nothing, in the face of legitimate, democratic votes.
longislander is offline