Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenbean
They have a fidiciary responsibility to provide privacy.
You give the Inn money in exchange for a private room - no different then any private room in your private home.
Furthermore, no one was smoking weed INSIDE the INN.
Obviously the Judge agreed with us.
|
With an idea like this, does that mean when someone takes someone into a hotel room by force, the privacy should be first and foremost, not the safety of the person being held? Plus, if they found weed in the room, then I am sure there was smoking going on either on the Inn property or in the room. As with any illegal act, if the safety of the guests either the one doing the act or the rest of the guests is in question, the Inn and the police have ALL THE RIGHT IN THE WORLD to go in and stop the illegal acts.