Quote:
Originally Posted by Pontoon Goon
I am wondering what peoples feelings are in regard to the proposed no wake zone in Weirs Bay being extended out to the #1 marker ? Alright I may be the one who proposed it and that was only to my wife but I think the idea has merit. That has got to be by far the most dangerous area on the lake. With boats funneling into the channel hard on a busy W/E, boats ignoring the 150 and coming out of the channel hard and not even taking into account boat traffic for the Weirs, it is a disaster in waiting. By extending the no wake it would give vessels the proper room to disperse and reduce the huge swells that create danger for smaller boats. The no wake zone was extended in Meredith a few years ago and I for one thinks it is working out great.
|
I think your idea has merit but now with all the new laws that we can not speak of and the 150 foot laws how many more do we need to impose. Most people who are out there causing the problems are not adhering to current rules. So pesonally I don't think adding more rules and regulations is the answer. I actually had proposed an idea similar to this a couple years back before this whole mess. I thought that if we could have limits in the bays whether it be no wakes or others, where the congestion is, it would satisfy both sides. But at this point I think it would be redundancy. PS. not trying to stir anything up here.
