Quote:
Originally Posted by Evenstar
Have you heard of the term "Carbon Footprint?"
Well, this is similar - only it is what I call your "Lake Footprint."
This is based on your boat's size X your average speed on the water X your length of time on the water.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to grasp the idea that (over the same time period) a large, fast moving boat is using more of the lake surface area than a small, slow moving boat.
|
Now you have really lost it...
Your formula is crap. And honestly, who cares? At any given time a 30' GFBL takes up 240 square feet (less of course due to the taper of the hull), and a 30' family boat takes up the same. When that 30' GFBL moves forward at 60mph, the space that it has occupied is now vacant. At any given time each boat takes up the same amount of space. How much distance a boat can cover depending on their speed matters how???
There is nothing to debate here because what you are debating about is foolish and makes not one bit of sense. Carbon footprint? I am quite familiar with it and the whole carbon credit concept.
If scaring a few GFBL's away and replacing them with many family boats, don't you think the multiple engines will be more of a pollutant than a few 'high hp" boats?
Here, I will start your next sentence for you. "You cannot out-debate me so you choose to criticize me" ...