Quote:
Originally popsted by Islander
This is the typical "let's pretend there is no problem" argument. Also known as "but I want to go fast".
However it all revolves around the premise that going fast is just as safe as going slow. An obvious lie!
The Coast Guard considers excessive speed as a major factor in boating accidents, but what do they know! Where's the Beef? Ask the USCG!
The oppositions inability to see the problem is the reason why we won!
|
Islander, you make claims and fear monger and yet when called on it the silence is deafening!
Quote:
Posted by Islander
"The leading causes of boating accidents are all operator-controlled, such as inexperience, inattention and excessive speed, the association said. The leading types of accidents include collisions with other vessels and collisions with fixed objects such as docks or channel markers. – CINDY KIBBE/NEW HAMPSHIRE BUSINESS REVIEW"
Gee, I think most people can see that a speed limit just might cut down on "excessive speed".
I think it is clear that one of the major reasons to enact a speed limit is to reduce the number of accidents involving excessive speed. You call that spin?
|
Then:
Quote:
Originally posted by Islander:
I think you left out a few qualifications. That data is only for one year on one lake. Even then I just counted 47 accidents in 2006 on Winnipesaukee involving speed.
You really need to post all those qualifications.
|
Quote:
I responded:
I used data from the same year that Bear Islander's article used that claimed to show a major jump in boating accidents in New Hampshire. I gave you the link that I used and I broke down everything that I saw.
The data I presented was for the entire state of New Hampshire not just Lake Winnipesaukee, so you didn't bother to read it, heh?
You claim 47 accidents on Lake Winnipesaukee in 2006 involving speed? Please document your claim and define "speed".
For these discussions I define "speed" as the proposed limits to YOUR law, 45/25.
I only show 2 accidents on Lake Winnipesaukee and 4 in the entire state that come close to that definition using New Hampshire statistics, none involving another vessel or a GFBL boat.
On Lake Winnipesaukee one PWC at 50 MPH and the other PWC at "Excessive Speed"..."Excessive Speed"...the definition that many supporters of HB847 claims does not exist...and it involved a turn so it was probably less than 45 mph.
Your move.
|
What you continue to fail to do, or ignore, is any statistic, report or fact to back up your claim!
Again I ask,
ISLANDER, YOU CLAIM
Quote:
"Even then I just counted 47 accidents in 2006 on Winnipesaukee involving speed"
|
SHOW ME WHERE!
I have shown you my statistics, my references and my links. All you do is say NO NO NO.
Prove it!