Quote:
Originally Posted by Skip
I am just presenting the facts of the case, and that the jury could and did consider Littlefield intoxicated, and that intoxication was the primary reason he was unable to maintain a proper lookut of his vessel.
That you refuse to acknowledge the facts as clearly stated by the Belknap Superior Court cast cited previously is your own business. However, the readers of this particular thread are entitled to see that your interpretation of the case is wrong.
I only step in when you grossly misrepresent case law, New Hampshire statutes or basic concepts of law.
Which you continue to do so with this particular case.
I hope this answers your questions.  |
Except that you are not presenting the facts in the case are you. You can not answer a couple of simple questions.
I only claimed that he was found not-guilty of BWI. Was my statement true or not?