View Single Post
Old 04-02-2008, 07:36 AM   #77
codeman671
Senior Member
 
codeman671's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,495
Thanks: 221
Thanked 812 Times in 488 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrc View Post
Funny thing is the new law will cause more development like the Bahre Mansion, Ok maybe not that big.

But a moneyed builder can buy the necessary acerage, file all the forms, hire all the engineers, surveyors and hydrologists to build pretty much anything he wants. Except maybe a boathouse.

Now a person with 100' x 100' lot on the shore pretty much cannot develop anything. Not a house, not a camp, nothing. He will have to spend a fortune to get approvals and exceptions and variances. His land is now virtually worthless. Eventually he will donate to the town or a conservation group just to stop the taxes. The tax assesor will never believe it's worthless. Maybe that's a good goal but if you're effectively taking this guys property, he should be compensated.
I may be wrong, but had heard that they cannot deem a property that WAS buildable under the previous laws to be non-buildable now.
codeman671 is offline   Reply With Quote