Thread: Radar Detectors
View Single Post
Old 02-26-2008, 10:19 PM   #21
hazelnut
Senior Member
 
hazelnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,348
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 508
Thanked 462 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Islander View Post
I have been totally up font with my opinions and desires about speed limits. Search my posts and you will find no evidence to the contrary. So either can it about my lies and untruths, or point one out.

If you are looking for a little honesty, do not look to the opposition for it. As I have pointed out the opposition blows hot and cold at the same time. I notice that your only response is to attack the pro-speed limit side. You are not defending the opposition inconsistencies because they are undependable.
Been there done that. #1 I posted my constructive stance on my position. This is back a few weeks ago. Guess you forgot.

#2 Do you really want me to go back and search your posts for evidence of you trying to spin "incidents" into why a Speed Limit is the answer. One needs not even TRY to look that hard. You yourself used the 2002 night time incident as an argument. A twisting of the facts determining speed was the reason BY YOU!

#3 Attacks? If you want to call it an attack every time someone calls you out on your posts attacks go ahead. Just tell the truth and the truth shall set you free. When you openly admit that the Speed Limit is an arbitrary way to rid the lake of excess boat traffic I will have no comment.

#4 Attacks by you... Easy, Check out the thread on sinking boats.
hazelnut is offline