Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Islander
"....hopefully will be defeated based on its numerous flaws, the chief one being that it is unenforceable. Proponents claim that marine patrol could use radar guns to accurately track boat speeds. Last summer, Salmon Press actually went out on the water to test this theory, with the help of the Gilford Police Department, and found that the radar guns almost always inaccurately clocked the test boat's speed,..."
So it seems the Meredith News thinks the data collected by the MP in the speed zones last summer are invalid.
Just pointing out one of those "you can't have it both ways" things.
The other one I like is that "the speed study shows nobody is speeding". Contrasted with "enforcement will be impossible, cost a fortune, ruin the economy.
|
That would fall under discussion of unenforceability of the law. At this point I would also bring up APS' point of "unpaid volunteers", except in this case (Salmon press) one could argue true neophytes attempting to operate in a totally unfamiliar environment. For the record, I don't want it both ways. If I accept your arguement at face value BI as you obviously do, I would point out the ludicrousness of a speed limit that can't be enforced and fire right back at ya " You can't have it both ways..."
Certainly the arguements against the speed limit far outweigh the arguements for it.
Less, you can blame NHPR, I blame the mass exodus of Mass. liberals from the hellhole they created down here, to the "red state" heaven up north. You're right though, times are a changin'. I wonder where they'll go when NH is wrecked?????!
