View Single Post
Old 08-27-2007, 05:52 PM   #202
ITD
Senior Member
 
ITD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moultonboro, NH
Posts: 2,925
Thanks: 476
Thanked 691 Times in 387 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Islander


......and they don't have any data available for release......

ITD - Where did you get this data? You claim to know for a fact that the data doesn't support speed limits. I am trying to keep an open mind about the data (it's not easy) so I want to go over it.

Or did you just make up the entire thing?

Come on Islander, I'm sure that's the last thing you want is for the MP to release the results of their tests. Since you have a selective memory I will put the post here again for you. The "data" clearly exists and is referenced by the guy you are working diligently to discredit.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ITD

From the Concord Monitor Article

"The data that we're collecting is not giving us a sense that there's a lot of high-speed boat traffic," he said. (Marine Patrol Director David Barrett)

From the Citizen Article http://www.citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070730/CITIZEN_01/107300226/-1/CITIZEN

"One thing he (Barrett) is confident in is that many unexperienced boaters who are viewing vessels from shore, are likely believing boats are going faster than they are."

This whole issue is a sham, we are going to end up with a law that isn't necessary. Stop this madness legislators.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Islander
That you think my statements constitute libel only proves that you don't understand the meaning of the word. Look it up.
Looked it up, yep, it applies. Slander might work a little better though.

In case you forgot what you posted, here's a gem:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Islander
I hope this doesn't effect any of those big money jobs in the boating industry he has been preparing for.
Where's your data for that statement? Pretty strong accusation of a public employee. S-L-A-N-D-E-R, L-I-B-E-L


ITD is offline