View Single Post
Old 10-13-2024, 09:51 AM   #7
John Mercier
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,354
Thanks: 3
Thanked 592 Times in 488 Posts
Default

The reason the Governor vetoed supposedly is that he wanted it just to affect lakefront properties. That would have required a slue of new enforcement efforts and been very unfair to those that purchased lakefront properties.

By focusing on the entire State, lawn care specialists and retail operations have an easier time adjusting to the changes, and the enforcement already exists.
John Mercier is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to John Mercier For This Useful Post: