View Single Post
Old 02-16-2006, 08:15 AM   #41
chipj29
Senior Member
 
chipj29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bow
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 521
Thanked 308 Times in 162 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RegalStan2450
That where the abbreviation "gfbl" came from I suppose. I never even heard of that abbreviation before HB162.

Funny thing is, a bass boat with a 200 hp+ motor will go almost 80+ mph. There are plenty of those out there. Many PWC's go 60+. How about an 80 mph sport cruiser. Many formulas like that.



The more I read the more I tend to believe this statement. I honestly come from a unbiased opinion. At the beginning of all this I was actually in favor of HB162 seeing my boat only goes 55 or so max ,and I do have young children.

Now I feel nothing but this as being a waste of time and money. HB162 IMO, has nothing to do with safety and will not make the lake any safer.
RegalStan, be sure to write your State Senator to let him/her know how you feel about HB162. You bring up some valid points.
chipj29 is offline