I guess none of the other opposition arguments worked with the House, so now we have the "it will cost a fortune" argument being tried on the Senate.
As pointed out, it doesn't have to cost one dime. This speed limit has gotten a lot of press, if it passes it will get even more. Signs would be a waste of money. NH enacts many laws without putting up signs to tell people about it.
When you register a boat you have to read, check off a few things, and sign the back of the return copy. Just add one more check off next year to tell people there is a speed limit. The printing change should cost little or nothing. People trailering in from other states have the responsibility to find out what the rules are in NH. In the very rare case of somebody not getting the word, all the people that will be waving at them, or the boat with the flashing blue light will inform them of their error.
Minor violations will be common, however not as common as minimum safe passage violations. Serious violations will be handled during the regular course of business by the MP.
Having 15 officers trained to use RADAR is absurd! One existing full time officer and one marine RADAR is the MOST that will be needed. He can set up at various times and locations on Winnipesaukee. If any other lakes report a speeding problem he can pay them a visit.
If, after a season or two, speeding is an enforcement problem then the MP can make a case for more training and equipment. I think this is VERY unlikely.
Lets not make a mountain out of this mole hill.
|