View Single Post
Old 08-01-2016, 11:36 AM   #11
VitaBene
Senior Member
 
VitaBene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Moultonborough
Posts: 3,587
Thanks: 1,623
Thanked 1,639 Times in 843 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shore things View Post
May I infer that you would like to know why we would allow the project seen in the photos or in the alternative, why we are not taking enforcement against it? If so, then let me say I am familiar with the site in question. It was not someone's project nor does it currently look as it does in those photographs. The damage seen was a natural slope failure that occurred on the Broads side of Wolfeboro Neck following a major rain event. I believe it was about 8 years ago. Emergency approvals to stabilize the site were issued to prevent further damage while formal restoration/ stabilization plans were completed.

If this does not answer your concerns please respond with a more specific question so we can attempt provide a meaningful answer.
Shore things, surely you are not implying that APS used an inaccurate, out of date photo to prove a point, are you?
VitaBene is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to VitaBene For This Useful Post: