View Single Post
Old 01-27-2006, 02:15 PM   #12
pm203
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 225
Thanks: 41
Thanked 86 Times in 46 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Jack
BH,
FLL's comments do not reflect those of anyone except himself and a very few others who seem to simply dislike cigarette boaters. While he is certainly entitled to his own opinion, please don't generalize that he represents all proponents or else you are just doing the same thing you are wrongly accusing proponents of doing. Almost every HB162 supporter I have met has been a supporter because of his/her concern for safety. With only a few exceptions among us, we don't want cigarette boaters to leave, we just want them, and all boaters, to slow down to a reasonable speed. 45mph is surely a reasonable speed for any appropriate recreational activity on a crowded lake.
Fat Jack,
Its nice to know your view on the subject. The starter of this post has views that I find insulting as well as ignorant. Why bask in the light of someones possible misfortune(if HB162 passes)? If Hb162 does get shot down, you won,t see me here rubbing your face in it.....A little more diplomacy and tact woul be appreciated, after all, we all enjoy the same lake.Thank you once again for differentiating yourself from the others.
pm203 is offline