Quote:
Originally Posted by Aubrey
Last January, when HB162 got started, I tried to come up with a compromise. I thought a speed limit was OK but that 45/25 was to low. I posted and talked to people about a 60/30 limit. There was some talk of a 65 limit.
Every compromise was shot down out of hand. We were told that a 100 MPH limit was not acceptable or even 200 MPH. It was "NO LIMITS!".
I think a lot of support could have been raised, even in winnfabs, for a higher limit. But the leaders of the no limit crowd thought they smelled victory. So now we are all going to be stuck with a speed limit that is to low!
|
Aubrey,
Can you tell me what your position is now. It seems you disagree with limits proposed by HB162 yet you supported it.
I don't get it..
Chase1