Winnipesaukee Forum - View Single Post

Aubrey · 12-06-2005, 12:23 PM

Last January, when HB162 got started, I tried to come up with a compromise. I thought a speed limit was OK but that 45/25 was to low. I posted and talked to people about a 60/30 limit. There was some talk of a 65 limit.

Every compromise was shot down out of hand. We were told that a 100 MPH limit was not acceptable or even 200 MPH. It was "NO LIMITS!".

I think a lot of support could have been raised, even in winnfabs, for a higher limit. But the leaders of the no limit crowd thought they smelled victory. So now we are all going to be stuck with a speed limit that is to low!

12-06-2005, 12:23 PM	#16
Aubrey Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 17 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Last January, when HB162 got started, I tried to come up with a compromise. I thought a speed limit was OK but that 45/25 was to low. I posted and talked to people about a 60/30 limit. There was some talk of a 65 limit. Every compromise was shot down out of hand. We were told that a 100 MPH limit was not acceptable or even 200 MPH. It was "NO LIMITS!". I think a lot of support could have been raised, even in winnfabs, for a higher limit. But the leaders of the no limit crowd thought they smelled victory. So now we are all going to be stuck with a speed limit that is to low!