Quote:
|
Originally Posted by codeman671
A speed limit would not have prevented it.
|
We'll never know that, will we? But if he had been going under 25MPH and the victim was still killed, you guys would not have to face this argument. It's not
our fault he was going so fast. I am just thankful that he was not going 70 (as many of you are still arguing for the "right" to do), or I suppose we would still be finding little pieces of the whole victim's family washing up on shore. (Sorry if this was a bit too graphic, but it needed to be said).
Besides. I did not "bring up" the Littlefield matter...I bought up something a SC judge said during the appeal. It's not my fault this happened at the Littlefield appeal. Does that make it off-limits? It would have been just as relevant had it been said by another SC judge in any other case. The statement had nothing to do with Littlefield. You are the one who keeps digging into the incident and somehow trying to
use it to prove a speed limit is unrelated.