Isn't this a very subjective way to assess value? What may be a beautiful to one may be an eye sore to another. Case in point the Baher Estate. If this was in my line of site I would think the quality of the panorama had dropped so would my taxes drop? They build bigger and bigger houses blast more rock, cut down more trees and scar the landscape so your panorama taxes should be going down?
As they say "Beauty is in the eye of the BEER HOLDER"
