Paugus Bay Resident, A wall is not leaning nearly as much as c-e wall was a few years ago. As a matter of fact A wall looks pretty good to me just by eyeballing it. Also c-e was much worse because cars were being parked right up against it & it was never back filled properly. A wall does not have that problem because there is no parking of heavy vehicles against it.
I'm not an engineer but I'm not aware that the board has hired anyone to properly investigate it either, although how would the members know since it is common practice for the MVYC board to keep its members in the dark (intentionally or unintentionally) not sure.
The board & the president were upset with the banter on this forum earlier in the season because allegedly the facts were not straight & the best source of info was the MVYC news letter or board members. So I ask now where is this info from the board or on the newsletter? This could be avoided if they communicated with the members.
A couple years ago the board outlined future projects & had a reasonable approach to financing them over the course of the next few years, A wall being one of them without charging special assessments to the members. If this assessment is true then what happened?
|