Quote:
Originally Posted by Acres per Second
The RSA says "residents".
A renter is not only "a resident", but human beings who express concerns for their safety—and the safety of their family.
Here is the crux of the issue:
I see it as a technicality: the major NWZ proponents could grant tiny percentages of ownership to each of his tenants, "legalizing" those signatures as listed in Town records. But why bother? 
Among other quality of life issues—this is a safety issue—and temporary residents bleed the same as other residents.  |
Temporary residents are also more likely to obtain temporary boating licenses (by answering 10 stupid questions asked by greedy marina owners), and are also more likely to cause the "bleeding" that you so readily mentioned. Where's the outrage now?
