View Single Post
Old 09-22-2010, 07:46 AM   #14
Skip
Senior Member
 
Skip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dover, NH
Posts: 1,615
Thanks: 256
Thanked 514 Times in 182 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alton Bay View Post
I think it should be mandatory for those who lost their primary races to remove their signs immediately after. I also think signs should only be on private property. It would eliminate a lot of clutter.
I believe that cnadidates should have a reasonable time to remove signs.

That said I agree with you 100% that each and every candidate should have to secure permission from a landowner to post a sign and all signs should be on private property.

To me it is just plain lazy to toss up countless signs on public property and not take the time or effort to secure property owner permission. A sign in the front lawn of a family or homeowner tells me the candidate has taken the time to deliver their message and get permission from the perspective voter.

I am always leary of the candidate that seems to have no signs on anyone's lawn, but has thirty plucked down in the middle of the Town square!

This current election cycle is a clear example of campaign workers run amuck when it came to posting signs along the State's highways and many local communities raodways and rights of way!
Skip is offline   Reply With Quote