Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaBene
This lake will never be "safe". 
|
Your argument is
not with me—but with member
Skip, who continues to assert:
Quote:
"The Lake is safe, continues to be safe and always was safe."
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaBene
I usually set my cruise control at 72-73 in a 65 MPH zone and find that most do the same. I rarely see egregious driving violations.
|
Then you missed the knot of southbound motorists I was caught up in going 85-MPH, on the way to the border. I realized I was "way-over", pulled in, and was promptly passed by a "Pilgrim" bus—going
90!
Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaBene
(I do live in Moultonboro, famous for the gauntlet!).
|
When managing "the gauntlet", one must pass not one—but two—schools with kiddies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaBene
Would one of your dull headed lances do a number on a lake vistor's undersized vessel?
|

You misquote—then miss my point completely.
Each
wood spar was a "silent sentinel" on every boater after dark—
PVC, not so much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by VitaBene
The only boats that I have seen on this lake that look like military boats are the MP's Rigid Inflatable Boats.: 
|
They don't have to be painted gray to look military. The attachment below shows a near-shore vessel of a foreign military that threatened a U. S. Navy ship in the Arabian Sea.
Another appeared recently in The U.S. Naval Institute's publication of
Proceedings, a monthly periodical. The issue reviews just one poor Caribbean country's interdiction fleet—featuring one of eight similar patrol boats—made by Nor-Tech.
Quote:
"...built without bunks and water tanks to fit 100 extra gallons of fuel and other equipment, such as a FLIR camera and communications equipment. They are used for coastal and riverine patrol, search and rescue operations, anti-narcotics operations, go-fast interdiction. They are armed with a M-60 machine gun and they carry M-16 rifles."
—Wikipedia
|
Isn't that "military"?
Here's the foreign-Navy vessel that threatened a U.S. Navy vessel: