Winnipesaukee Forum - View Single Post

birchhaven · 08-04-2010, 04:09 PM

The rail road company is subsidized by the state, so they get paid to run empty or full does not matter.
If they made money I would have a different opinion than the one I am about to express but the rail road cost all us tax payers money. It should be dissolved, and the trail should either go in or the land should go back to the original plot owners (at one point the land that the tracks were on was owned by the abutting property) or some mix of those two ideas.
Food for thought.

08-04-2010, 04:09 PM	#38
birchhaven Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 132 Thanks: 14 Thanked 54 Times in 30 Posts	side note. The rail road company is subsidized by the state, so they get paid to run empty or full does not matter. If they made money I would have a different opinion than the one I am about to express but the rail road cost all us tax payers money. It should be dissolved, and the trail should either go in or the land should go back to the original plot owners (at one point the land that the tracks were on was owned by the abutting property) or some mix of those two ideas. Food for thought.