View Single Post
Old 06-11-2010, 06:24 AM   #44
tis
Senior Member
 
tis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,724
Thanks: 752
Thanked 1,457 Times in 1,014 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jrc View Post
Jmen and lawn pyscho seem to be ready to blindly let the government decide for them which safety features and codes are appropriate for them. I don't trust them.

Some rules are really needed, some are motivated by other issues like supporting industries, protecting trades, by misguided and outdated ecology, some by over-reaction to a single incident, by ignorance and some by politics.

Most are a cost vs benefit trade-off, I'm smarter than some government bureaucrat, I'll make the trade-off.
I'm with you. Government rules and regulations forcing people to do things they would rather not, don't always make things better. For example, look at the BP mess, I can imagine they were loaded up with rules and regulations, but that awful spill still happened. (I don't want to start getting off topic by mentioning this, it is just and example.)
tis is offline   Reply With Quote