View Single Post
Old 06-10-2010, 11:23 AM   #12
AC2717
Senior Member
 
AC2717's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Maynard, MA & Paugus Bay
Posts: 2,574
Thanks: 753
Thanked 354 Times in 266 Posts
Default Come On

Anyone else see the fact that is happens very infrequent and thsi sprinkler law is jumping way out there in left field as an over re-action?
Talk about lining the pockets of contractors

The insurance way would be the way to go, cause lets face it:
a fre can or cannot be a total loss, but a fire with the activation of a sprinkler system with all the water damage resulting is almost or might as well be a total loss.
And then add on top of it the now more frequent pipe bursts an regular leakage due to the large temperature swings and expansion and retraction of the pipes

I am in the business of insurance and if people saw the number of losses due to sprinkler systems on the commercial side, please do not think I am saying that it is not a very important life saving device, it is, but sometimes after something is beaten to death, there is no point of return
__________________
Capt. of the "No Worries"
AC2717 is offline   Reply With Quote