View Single Post
Old 01-22-2010, 08:12 PM   #5
Resident 2B
Senior Member
 
Resident 2B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Shore, MA
Posts: 1,357
Thanks: 994
Thanked 313 Times in 163 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomC View Post
right? there's been thread after thread about how the landowners shouldn't have any more rights to the water than anyone else.. I expect to see the same passion from the boaters who want to raft anywhere/everywhere to foot the bill for milfoil mitigation. Maybe a fee tacked on to the registrations or perhaps higher launch ramp fees..? That's fair right? Or is THIS an expense that it's OK to stick to the property tax payers in Moultonborough and the rest of the waterfront towns?

At a minimum, since we're constantly reminded that the lake is a state resource, then the state should pick up the tab..
I agree as well. Milfoil is not just a town problem, it is everyone's problem.

I also see LG's point and how a devaluation of waterfront properties will have a huge impact on the tax burden on the non-waterfront properties, assuming the base remains the same.

R2B
Resident 2B is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links