I did find this:
"Pathways of introduction
The most common pathway of introduction into natural waters is stocking by humans. In the 1970-80s the stocking policy in the region was liberal, and the signal crayfish was introduced legally into a large number of natural waters. From the late 1980s onwards, the introduction of the signal crayfish into new areas was restricted by the environmental authorities due to the threat it posed to the indigenous, red-listed noble crayfish (Troschel and Dehus 1993, Skurdal et al. 1999, Edsman 2004). However, the distribution of the signal crayfish still rapidly increases, including more and more watercourses. The crayfish can spread by natural migration only within a watercourse, between migration barriers. Most of the current spread is therefore due to illegal introductions by humans."
Quoted from this article: Page 3
http://www.nobanis.org/files/factshe...eniusculus.pdf
This article, (page 3) also discribed when and why crayfish "migrate"
http://hyg.ipm.illinois.edu/pdf/hygpest200908.pdf
It's seems it is caused by extensive rainy periods.
We haven't had that lately...