Log in

View Full Version : Double mouthed laker

Hillcountry
08-22-2019, 10:34 AM
Anyone see the picture of the freak laker that was caught on Champlain? Very weird. 2 Separate mouths...don’t know if the second one was functional though.
Hillcountry
08-22-2019, 10:37 AM
Here it is...
Descant
08-22-2019, 11:55 AM
Wow! Is there a nuke plant on Chaplain that I forgot/didn't know about?
Hillcountry
08-22-2019, 12:01 PM
Wow! Is there a nuke plant on Chaplain that I forgot/didn't know about?

Maybe “Bernie” flushes his toilet directly into Champlain...THAT would be highly toxic.
Top-Water
08-22-2019, 03:38 PM
Anyone see the picture of the freak laker that was caught on Champlain? Very weird. 2 Separate mouths...don’t know if the second one was functional though.

That's a pretty amazing picture.
ApS
08-22-2019, 07:23 PM
Yes it is :eek2: and this guy is mature.

Looks like this specimen breathes through the lower jaw, and catches his meals with the upper jaw. (Works for him). ;)

This is how Evolution works—although this guy is a likely dead-end.
:look:
Descant
08-22-2019, 11:15 PM
Maybe “Bernie” flushes his toilet directly into Champlain...THAT would be highly toxic.

LMAO. True wit. Thank you. Wouldn't it be ironic if he did truly have a failed septic?
dt5150
08-23-2019, 07:57 AM
what the?!? now that's creepy.. looks like one of the fish from the pond by the nuke plant on the simpsons. i'd be curious to see a pic from the side, to see how the gills relate to the mouths.
Hillcountry
08-23-2019, 11:06 AM
what the?!? now that's creepy.. looks like one of the fish from the pond by the nuke plant on the simpsons. i'd be curious to see a pic from the side, to see how the gills relate to the mouths.

It appears the gills are associated with the upper orifice if you zoom in a bit.
billy
08-23-2019, 11:14 AM
Photoshopped much?


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=92687)
Hillcountry
08-24-2019, 06:14 AM
Photoshopped much?


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=92687)

I don’t think so. Why would anyone go through the trouble of photo shopping such an insignificant anomaly? Perhaps a picture of a baby “Champy” would be shop-worthy but not this.
billy
08-24-2019, 06:50 AM
...You are absolutely right Hill!


Sent from my iPhone using Winnipesaukee Forum mobile app (http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=92687)
hilltopper
08-27-2019, 05:23 PM
Possibly caught again... check out the article on WMUR.